A Christmas Carol

This section is for general debates and discussions (excluding politics) with other forum members. Those wishing to enter into political dialogue with fellow members please use the Politics section below.

Everybody is entitled to their own views whether you agree or disagree. Please respect other forum members views and be courteous at all times. Bullying or abusing other forum members will not be tolerated.
Post Reply
Brandyboy

A Christmas Carol

#1

Post: # 1749Post Brandyboy »

I`ve just watched the BBC`s adaptation of A Christmas Carol and I enjoyed it immensely .. probably a few too many effs and bit too much poetic license, but I enjoyed it.

Not sure if portraying Mary Cratchit as a half caste worked very well, but I suspect it was the BBC being PC, but then Dickens didn`t specify her race.

It was all a bit like having one of your favourites songs performed by another artiste, but in a completely different style ... But it worked for me.

¡SHARE TOPIC!

Advertisement

Sheff_Blade
Posts: 321
Joined: 05 Nov 2019 19:17

Re: A Christmas Carol

#2

Post: # 1751Post Sheff_Blade »

Yes, it was very good though I haven't seen the end yet so don't spoil it for me(!). My only reservations were that it was a little too PC. Would someone who f's and blind's really say Christmas was humbug? Did the dark pasts of Scrooge and Marley have to include such criminal negligence of health and safety? The whole point of the Dickens' version was that Scrooge had the potential, even at his meanest, to be a likeable character. This version painted Scrooge and Marley so black, effectively they were guilty of wholesale murder, that it was difficult to empathise.
Brandyboy

Re: A Christmas Carol

#3

Post: # 1753Post Brandyboy »

No I won`t spoil it for you suffice to say that it does adhere the whole ethos behind Dicken`s Christmas message ... for which I was pleased. ;)

And the BBC did say that it was based on his novel .. so that could mean a variety of things.
Francisco

Re: A Christmas Carol

#4

Post: # 1761Post Francisco »

..It is a shedload of license money spent on a crude, dark, sensationalistic attempt to present a modernistic improvement of a work of genius.
Piss ,Shit, Fuck...it was a BBC series produced to appeal to the baser instincts of viewers, the very same who must then pronounce it cool, lest others should think them unsophisticated,prim, even, ..

"what?" they parrot..." Nowt wrong with a bit of swearing, shagging employees wives for money, peeing on graves..."
" but where's the nudity?..not enough blood..."

Only fools think they can improve on Dickens....none have succeeded yet...but lacking that genius themselves...many have had to try...this is just another one destined never to be heard of after just one showing!!
Fools indeed ...
Brandyboy

Re: A Christmas Carol

#5

Post: # 1772Post Brandyboy »

Francisco my interllectual friend.

An adaptation is never an improvement ... and it just that ...an adaptation.
But having studied Charles Dickens for many years I think he would have approved.

The message behind Charles Dickens's ' A Christmas Carol ' is very simplistic and the sentiments that he portrays in that message are universal worldwide.
I've read Samuel Pepys`s diary many times and profanity was common in the 17th century so was shagging your employees wife. ;)
Last edited by Brandyboy on 28 Dec 2019 12:14, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Andy F
Posts: 8
Joined: 07 Nov 2019 11:01

Re: A Christmas Carol

#6

Post: # 1782Post Andy F »

Sounds like another BBC 'box ticking' exercise. Was there a wheelchair in there somewhere I wonder? Someone with a suspicious shortage of limbs perhaps?

Not trying to be nasty or anything, just getting a bit pissed off with BBC PC.


Maybe I'm just of the wrong generation :roll: Glad I didn't watch it.
Francisco

Re: A Christmas Carol

#7

Post: # 1791Post Francisco »

JamesB wrote: 27 Dec 2019 18:26

I've read Samuel Pepys`s diary many times and profanity was common in the 19th century so was shagging your employees wives. ;)

Well, jamesB, if its authenticity you are applauding, then as well as the urination fornication and profanities the BBC utilised to tittilate and shock, why were they too PC to use the words blackamoor and negro and halfbreed in their production.
These words were common in Pepy's 17th century, and Dicken's 19th century....but too offensive now for the BBC?

...for the luvvies...a push too far, maybe...?
terry8
Posts: 8
Joined: 28 Oct 2019 10:40
Location: la florida

Re: A Christmas Carol

#8

Post: # 1814Post terry8 »

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/ala ... mic-actor/

Alastair Sim:- best ever scrooge and still nobody to touch him.
Brandyboy

Re: A Christmas Carol

#9

Post: # 1815Post Brandyboy »

Yes, my favourites version also .. and I liked him too in the St Trinians films..
But that`s another story. :thumbs up:

Advertisement

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in