Death penalty?
Advertisement
Re: Death penalty?
I would say it is much safer to make a conviction today than 30 or so years agocrummy wrote: 14 May 2025 05:41 Still think the death penalty is okay?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce809e3gd1xo
The advances in DNA and other sciences make it virtually impossible to make a mistake compared to then
It's a travesty with this man as probably with many others wrongly convicted , but that's how it goes
I hope they compensate him generously for all those lost years, but i still think the death penalty should be reinstated for certain individuals, especially @astards like Rudakubana
- These users thanked the author jimny1 for the post:
- Razor Ruddock
Re: Death penalty?
So it would be okay to kill a few innocent people to get revenge on one?
Back to the dark ages and Taliban law..
Back to the dark ages and Taliban law..
You are not just judged by the company you keep, but the company you keep away from.
Re: Death penalty?
It works just fine in the USA. Another scumbag bites the dust tonight at 11 pm Spanish time, 6 pm Florida.
- These users thanked the author Brandyboy for the post (total 2):
- Razor Ruddock • jimny1
Re: Death penalty?
just because the USA could not possibly get anything wrong does not mean it is the same in the UK..Brandyboy wrote: 15 May 2025 18:29 It works just fine in the USA. Another scumbag bites the dust tonight at 11 pm Spanish time, 6 pm Florida.
.
You are not just judged by the company you keep, but the company you keep away from.
-
Razor Ruddock
- Posts: 138
- Joined: 14 Oct 2023 11:06
Re: Death penalty?
I guess if someone killed three kids at a dance class, there were witnesses, the murder weapon was found and the perpetrator was arrested in the area.
Then there’s a fair chance that the conviction would be more than a 1000% safe and the perpetrator has no further purpose being on this earth, so the death penalty would be a less than just punishment. So unless we are prepared to tie each of his limbs to four vehicles and tear the bastard limb from limb, which would see justice served, hanging would have to do.
CRUMMY and the rest of the tree huggers, what do you reckon?
Then there’s a fair chance that the conviction would be more than a 1000% safe and the perpetrator has no further purpose being on this earth, so the death penalty would be a less than just punishment. So unless we are prepared to tie each of his limbs to four vehicles and tear the bastard limb from limb, which would see justice served, hanging would have to do.
CRUMMY and the rest of the tree huggers, what do you reckon?
- These users thanked the author Razor Ruddock for the post:
- jimny1
-
Sheff_Blade
- Posts: 321
- Joined: 05 Nov 2019 19:17
Re: Death penalty?
Yes, when you consider that more people have been murdered by murderers released from prison than 'innocent' (allegedly) people hanged.
- These users thanked the author Sheff_Blade for the post (total 2):
- Brandyboy • Razor Ruddock
Re: Death penalty?
Good comment, but then life should mean life, with no chance of parole, as in America in many cases.Sheff_Blade wrote: 28 May 2025 16:50Yes, when you consider that more people have been murdered by murderers released from prison than 'innocent' (allegedly) people hanged.
Personally I think with that sentence it's better to just put them down and get it over with.
Advertisement
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute


¡SHARE TOPIC!